Friday, November 18, 2016

Lab 8 DNA isolation

Introduction
            DNA isolation is the process in which we can purify a DNA sample using a combination of physical and chemical methods. In this lab, we focused on a processes called PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit to layout a specific procedure base to help isolate genomic DNA from the environmental sample one’s heart desires. The kit is used specifically to tackle high humic acid content including difficult soil types such as compost, sediment, and manure.
            We happened to work with a pure culture of E. Coli, a collected activated sludge sample and also a pure culture of a Methylobacterium. We then just isolated the three types of samples to where we can store the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) to use in another lab. This process is a breakthrough for genetic modification in the science world.

Methods/Procedure
            Let us begin with simply taking the designated sample that was given (ours was the Methylobacterium) and add a fourth of a gram to the PowerBead Tubes provided. Gently vortex for maximum mixing power. Next, check for precipitates in your C1 solution, if theres solids then heat at 60 degrees’ Celsius till dissolved. We can now add 60 μL of Solution C1, then
Mix with shaker briefly. Now bust out the vortex and give the O’sample a shaking for 10 minutes at maximum speed. We now can use the best thing ever, The Centrifuge. Centrifuge tubes at 10,000 x g for 30 seconds at room temperature. Now after 30 seconds has passed, transfer the supernatant to a clean 2 mL Collection Tube which should be provided. We can now add 250 μL of Solution C2 and vortex for 5 seconds. Incubate at 4°C for 5 minutes. Well, back to the Centrifuge, keeping in mind that the tubes should be at room temperature for 1 minute at 10,000 x g. Avoiding the pellet, transfer up to, but no more than, 600 μl of supernatant to a clean 2 ml Collection Tube which again is provided. Add 200 μl of Solution C3 and vortex briefly. Incubate at 4°C for 5 minutes. Centrifuge the tubes at room temperature for 1 minute at 10,000 x g. Avoiding the pellet, transfer up to, but no more than, 750 μl of supernatant into a clean 2 ml in provided Collection Tube. Shake that sample like you’ve never done before to mix Solution C4 before use. Add 1200 μl of Solution C4 to the supernatant and vortex for 5 seconds. Load approximately 675 μl onto a Spin Filter and centrifuge at 10,000 x g for 1 minute at room temperature. Discard the flow through and add an additional 675 μl of supernatant to the Spin Filter and centrifuge at 10,000 x g for 1 minute at room temperature. Load the remaining supernatant onto the Spin Filter and centrifuge at 10,000 x g for 1 minute at room temperature. A total of three loads for each sample processed are required. Add 500 μl of Solution C5 and centrifuge at room temperature for 30 seconds at 10,000 x g. Discard the flow through. Centrifuge again at room temperature for 1 minute at 10,000 x g. Carefully place spin filter in a clean 2 mL Collection Tube (provided). Avoid splashing any Solution C5 onto the Spin Filter. Add 100 μl of Solution C6 to the center of the white filter membrane and Centrifuge at room temperature for 30 seconds at 10,000 x g. Discard the Spin Filter. The DNA in the tube is now ready for any downstream application. No further steps are required. If not using immediately, store at -80 degrees’ C.

Results
            We have no results just yet for this lab due to it leading to another set of labs.





Discussion

            We now can see that I typed the word Centrifuge 1 too many times. But this was a interesting lab that was simple but intriguing. We can use the DNA that was isolated for PCR in a later lab.

Wednesday, November 16, 2016

Lab 7

EES 4102C Wastewater Microbiology
Lab #7: Characterization of Industrial Wastewater

Introduction
                  Wastes brought to landfills are subjected to either groundwater underflow or infiltration from rain water. As water collects throughout the waste in the landfill, it tends to pick up a variety of inorganic and organic compounds. This then flows out of the wastes to accumulate at the bottom of the landfill resulting in contaminated water known to us as leachate. Given that Municipal landfill leachate is high in concentrations of dissolved heavy metals, organic and inorganic compounds.  This all can cause variations in dissolved oxygen, pH, and turbidity. When treatment plants take the leachate, they need to know if the treatment plant can handle the leachate without pre-treatment or if it needs to be pre-treated beforehand.  
Methods and materials
Even though we can look at many aspects of leachate, we are focusing on Specific oxygen uptake rate (SOUR), dissolved oxygen, turbidity, and pH.
Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate (SOUR) was found by first and formost making sure to calibrate the DO meter. We then needed to get about two-300 mL BOD bottle, this was then used to collect varied samples of leachate to wastewater volumes. The volumes can be reported like:
    1. 100% leachate and 1% (v/v) leachate:wastewater
    2. 100% leachate and 3% (v/v) leachate:wastewater
    3. 100% leachate and 5% (v/v) leachate:wastewater
    4. 100% leachate and 10% (v/v) leachate:wastewater
    5. 100% leachate and 20% (v/v) leachate:wastewater
    6. 100% leachate and 50% (v/v) leachate:wastewater
    7. 100% leachate and 75% (v/v) leachate:wastewater
Start with the leachate:wastewater mix first! not the 100% leachate. We then filled only half the container as we aerated the sample thoroughly by shaking then place on a stir plate with a stir bar to continue aeration. Now that we have added some aeration we need to fill up the rest of the BOD bottle to just below overflowing with sample. Be sure to immediately insert DO meter and displace enough of the sample to fill top of bottle. This is to isolate contents from the atmosphere. You have to add some movement to the DO probe but very slight to make sure you don’t add too much oxygen back in. After Meter has stabilized, record initial DO (mg/L). Record DO concentration in 2-10 second intervals over a 5 minute period, or until DO becomes stabilized. Then just repeat for given samples.
Now for DO we have to making sure the meter is set to DO (mg/L) mode, rinse the probe with distilled water before each time you make a measurement just to keep contamination at a minimum. Dip the rinsed DO probe into testing solution and stir very slowly! Wait till stable and record the value. Now repeat in triplicates.
Turbidity is a bit tricky with the numbering but very easy to actually do. Turbidity is the measurement that tends to go hand-and-hand with water clarity. To do this you need a handy dandy turbidimeter. Wash the sample bottle in the machine with that of your sample of interest just to minimize contamination. Then fill the vile with your sample and place in the machine. Turn the vile ever so slightly in a 360 degree rotation and pay attention to the smallest number that is displaced. This is to stop the variations in the sample bottle. Repeat in triplicates
We end our experiment with finding pH, This is the total amount of Hydrogen ions in a given sample. The higher the Hydrogen concentrations, the lower the pH. So grab your pH meter and rinse the tip between your measurements. To test the pH, dip the probe into your sample and stir slightly around until giving you a stable number. Now just repeat in triplicates.

Results

Sample calculation shown below:

Sample of 75% 
Has a VSS of 0.11 g/L
Oxygen Uptake Rate of 0.069 mg/L/s
(SOUR) is about 2250 mg/g/hr

Discussion
stay tuned



Sunday, October 23, 2016

Antibiotic Resistance of bacteria in biofilms
In biofilms, resistance seems to go hand and hand with multicellular strategies. Thus we look at features of biofilm infections, emerging mechanisms of resistance and how we can potentially treat. The inability for antibiotics to be used on biofilm based mechanisms is shown to have three separate hypotheses. First being slow penetration, second being the resistance of a phenotype and third is about an altered microenvironment.
The idea behind a biofilm in this study is to adhere to the biomaterial’s surface (catheters, prosthetic heart valves, etc.) that we use to help people with other diseases. This is dangerous because biofilm have bacteria inside that evade the host defenses and withstand antimicrobial chemotherapy. In laymans terms, it’s hard to kill the bacteria with medicine. Studies have shown that even those with adaptive and strong immune systems still have trouble resolving the bacterial infection. Susceptibility Tests have been shown to indicate that even when using bacterial treatment up to hundreds or even a thousand times the minimum inhibitory concentration, bacteria still manage to survive. The medicine kills the free floating bacteria but fails to wipe out the bacteria in-cased by the biofilm. Typically, the result of this infection then has to be surgically removed from the body.  The relevance of the understanding of antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms to engineering because we consider that most of the bacteria that favor biofilms in the body are Pseudomonas aeruginosa or S epidermidis due to the ability to adept at forming biofilm, which mainly reside in our water, air, soil, or skin. The main objective of environmental engineers is focused on water and how to we process it. Considering this, Environmental Engineers can help monitor for the bacteria of interest.

Looking at the results we can compare to what was hypothesized from above. The idea behind Antibiotic Resistance of bacteria in biofilms is broken down into three separate ideas. The first hypothesis is a slow or incomplete penetration of antibiotics inside the biofilm itself. Using measurements of antibiotic penetration into biofilms, some antibiotics permeate (spread through) bacterial biofilms. However, it has also been shown that it is possible for the antibiotics to be deactivated in the biofilm. This would make penetration much more difficult or even impossible. The second hypothesis is that a subpopulation of microbes in the biofilm form unique and highly protective phenotypic-state much like spore formation. Test to show this hypothesis were shown by having support from studies that show resistance to newly formed biofilms that were too thin to pose a barrier from antibiotics. The third hypothesis was stated on the basis of how altered chemical microenvironment within the biofilms helped with protection. Biofilms are known to feature microscale gradients in nutrient concentrations. It has been found in studies using mini-electrodes that oxygen can be completely consumed in the surface layer of the biofilm. This then leads to anaerobic niches in deep layers of the biofilm. Concentration gradients in metabolic products then mirror substrates. Acidic waste then has the ability to increase the level of pH between the bulk layer and the biofilm. This is the part that will antagonize the action of the antibiotic. We know this is important because we know certain antibiotics work less efficient when in anaerobic conditions compared too aerobic. Also the depletion of a substrate could also cause some bacteria to enter a non-growing state, this is bad because certain antibiotics like Penicillin, target cell-wall synthesis which kill only growing bacteria.
Results relating to current practices help in the future of understanding biofilms because biofilm resistance depends on aggregation of bacteria in multicellular communities. One strategy might be to develop therapies that disrupt the multicellular structure of the biofilm. Some other potential therapies may include having an enzyme that dissolves the matrix polymers of the biofilm, using a chemical reaction to block biofilm matrix synthesis, and block microbial signaling that would interfere with cell to cell communication. This required for normal biofilms to function. We need to understand the multicellular nature of microbial life before treating the infections from biofilms.



Stewart, Philip S., and J. William Costerton. "Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms." The Lancet 358.9276 (2001): 135-138.